Monday, January 20, 2014

NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968) 

Dir.   George A. Romero

Back in 1968, George Romero was already successful at producing and directing commercials with a company he and his friends started called Image Ten Productions.  They decided they wanted to try their hands at a feature.  They decided the easiest and most accessible genre was Horror.  They pitched in roughly $10,000 each and soon George was writing the script for the cult phenomenon that would become NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD.
When production and editing were finished the group threw the film reels into the trunk of a car and drove towards New York to find a theater, any theater, willing to project their film.  And around the time Malcolm X was shot, they found one.
The film starred Judith O’Dea, Duane Jones, Karl Harman, and Marilyn Eastman as the core group of people stuck inside an old house in the middle of the Pennsylvania countryside during an outbreak of Mass Hysteria.  The film opens as Barbara (O’Dea) and her brother Johnny are driving up to put a wreath on the grave of their father. They bicker as Johnny turns off the radio just as news about this event is about to be broadcast, leaving them unaware.  Moments later, after teasing Barbara in front of a seemingly harmless man wandering, the horror begins. The man attacks and kills Johnny leaving Barbara to fend for herself and escape.  She finds her way to the seemingly abandoned home where she takes shelter.  Very soon she is met by Ben, who himself just escaped Ghoul chaos at a diner a few miles away.  That’s one thing that should be noted about NOTLD, that never once is the word Zombie uttered.  They are referred to as Ghouls.
Ben starts boarding up the house to protect he and Barbara and after awhile the basement door flies open and out pours, Harry, Tom, Judy and Helen.  Harry and Helen are an unhappily married couple constantly bickering as their daughter lies in the basement suffering from the effects of having been bitten.  Tom and Judy are teenagers who seem scared and uncertain, and it is Ben who immediately takes charge.  But his methods anger Harry.  During 1968, and the Civil Rights Movement, the idea of an African American taking charge was unheard of. And although Romero maintains that Ben could have been played by either a white or black actor, it still stands out that Ben is black and in charge.
Soon the movie becomes not a film about people against monsters, but rather people against people. The infighting between two men, husband and wife, racial tensions and the idea of gender roles are brought to the surface.  And what happens when people can’t or won’t work together?  Things start falling apart and soon we find the hopes of survival diminishing. And that is what makes Night of the Living Dead stand out.  Granted some of the characters become victims to the Ghouls but most of their fates lie in their inability to work together.  Pride, ego and anger are the true “monsters” in this film.
Ultimately Night of the Living Dead has gone on to become on of the most respected cult films in history and Romero has gone on to make several more “Zombie Films” to varying degrees of success.  But he created the genre and dozens of filmmakers have copied or have been influenced by this film and this filmmaker.   Night of the Living Dead is seen less as a horror film, and more as a study into the human condition, especially during the tumultuous times of the late 1960’s when Vietnam raged on, major assassinations were taking place, and the Civil Rights Movement was in full swing.  Whether or not Romero intended all of these subtexts to the film is still not truly known.  He shy’s away from saying that all we get is what he intended, but maybe he didn’t realize how deep this low budget film really was and what it said and still says about society at large.
GRADE- A

Watch the movie here....

Black Swan Review

Black Swan- Movie Review
BLACK SWAN (2010)

Director:


Stars:


 Darren Aronofsky follows his overrated film The Wrestler with the dark and melodramatic ballet feature, Black Swan.  It is the story of Nina Sayers played gracefully and stunningly by Natalie Portman who deservedly won the Best Actress award at this year’s Oscar’s ceremony.  The story is simple, Nina is a ballet dancer who desperately wants the feature role of the Swan Queen in Swan Lake, but the role necessitates a dancer who can portray the White Swan and Black Swan.  Nina has all the makings of the White Swan but lacks the passion and sensuality needed to do justice to the role of the Black Swan.  She is given the part anyway and we follow her slow and sometimes confusing descent into madness.

The story really is simple, but told with such originality and fear, as we follow Nina’s descent into madness.  The subtexts and symbolism are what makes this movie great.  When I was in high school I dated a dancer who spent all her free time dancing.  She didn’t have to attend half of her classes so she could be in the studio dancing.  Ultimately our relationship failed because she had no time for me, or better said, a life outside of dancing.  When she wasn’t dancing, she was sleeping, and when she wasn’t doing either of those things she was thinking about dancing. 

Nina spends the movie living completely in a world inhabited by dancing.  This has led to a great ability to dance, but has robbed her of passion, because she hasn’t lived life.  Her dedication to her art has cheated her out of experiencing many things the rest of us experience every day.  This is a part of the film I liked best.  Artists spend so much time practicing their art that they forget or just simply don’t have time or make time to experience life.  That experience is crucial in the success of whatever art medium one has chosen.  So when other girls are out having fun, having sex, and living, Nina is dancing or being kept under lock and key by her overbearing and creepy mom, played by Barbara Hershsey.  Nina doesn’t even have a lock on her bedroom door.  Her mom is her shadow making sure Nina doesn’t miss out or lose the chance at greatness that she herself seems to have lost or sacrificed.  Nina’s determination and passion coupled with her mom’s overbearing ways drives Nina out of control.  She starts hallucinating, and soon we realize that Nina’s White Swan is starting to be overcome by the birth of her Black Swan.  The Black Swan within her is fighting desperately to be released.   Nina just wants to be the best performer she can, and soon it seems as it’s at any cost. 

Nina becomes friends with Lily, played by Mila Kunis, who herself seems just like the Black Swan, and soon Nina becomes delusional as to what Lily’s intentions are.  She becomes convinced that Lily is there to steal the title role and she won’t let that happen.  Lily actually represents the Black Swan growing within Nina in real life.  Reality and fantasy becomes blurred in regards to Lily and what she is and what she does.  We, the viewer, are kept off guard because truthfully, Nina is off guard, not realizing what is happening to her.  She is finally confronted by her mother who now thinks she is out of control and she keeps Nina locked in the bedroom, but Nina will not be stopped from performing and actually assaults her mother in an effort to escape.  At this point the Black Swan has completely taken over Nina’s persona and all traces of the White Swan seem to have vanished.

The film ends with the performance of Swan Lake, and in between moments show the final descent of Nina and what extreme’s she went to achieve perfection and success.  Nina’s story is extreme, but not uncommon in the real world where people dream of and strive for stardom, success and perfection.   The story also reveals that artists need to live a life outside their art in order to better serve their art.  And sometimes we just have to accept who or what we are.
GRADE: A

What Happened To Robert DeNiro?

What Happened To Robert DeNiro?
Many people have written Robert DeNiro off.  There was a time when saying he was in a movie meant you had to go see it, but then after 1995 his name on a movie meant that the movie was probably garbage?  So what happened?

During the 1980's after a few flops, which happens to all actors, DeNiro stopped starring in films for awhile but rather made cameo appearances in films, or smaller supporting roles.  At one point his star had faded so much that he petitioned to star in BIG, and was turned down. Can you imagine DeNiro dancing on an oversized keyboard with Robert Loggia.

Then he came back to the fold working with Scorsese again in Goodfella's and suddenly DeNiro was hot again.  He still did the ocassional supporting role like in Backdraft, but he was seen as having returned to his former self.  Then in 1995 he concreted his reputation by releasing HEAT and CASINO within a month of eachother, wowing critics and fans alike. 

Since then he has gone out of his way to prove to us how bad and lazy of an actor he really is.  With releases like ROCKY and BULLWINKLE, GODSEND, HIDE and SEEK, ANALYZE THAT, and those awful focking FOCKER movies, DeNiro lost any credibility and reputation he had earned.  Hard to imagine that the same guy who played Travis Bickle is now wearing a fake breast feeding contraption in MEET THE FOCKERS.  The same guy who played Jake LaMotta is now acting in a Jason Statham movie. 

What the fuck happened?

I have a few idea's.  First and foremost is age.  Look at any actor or musician and you'll realize as they age their talent fades.  This maybe cannot be helped.  As we age we get tired and aren't up to the same level of performance dedication we once were.  The Rolling Stones suck, Paul McCartney won't stop singing Hey Jude, and DeNiro can't seem to act anymore. Sure there have been a few exceptions where his performance was decent or good, but it was surrounded by a movie that was lesser than he, such as, MEN OF GLORY, EVERYBODY'S FINE and CITY BY THE SEA.

I personally don't expect DeNiro to gain or lose massive weight or bulk up, I mean the guy is 68, but the scripts and the performances aren't even up to Adam Sandlers quality.

My other theory is that DeNiro is being offered much more money for these films, and is finally taking the paycheck.  If you research his great older films, he wasn't paid much, and they didn't do well at the box office.  Now his films do well, and he gets PAID!!!!!

My final theory, coupled with the theory above, is that he owns TRIBECA FILMS.  This company can only survive by being financed, and financing means doing movies that might suck but pay well.  And if you notice alot of these shit movies he has been in have had Tribeca as Producer.  So he gets paid double.  The money gets funneled back into Tribeca which will exist long after DeNiro is gone from this planet.

It is a shame to no longer look forward to anything DeNiro does, but he has proven himself and has other interests to pay for.  We should give him a break and stop expecting him to perform as if he was 35.  I mean look at what happened to Pacino since SCENT OF A WOMAN, the dude talks with a southern accent in all his movies, has a bad tan, and an awkward looking toupee he is trying to pass off as real. And is currently co-starring with Adam Sandler in JACK AND JILL.

Alot has happened to Robert DeNiro, but unless we ask him why he does the films he does, we'll never understand his thought process. And if you read interviews with the guy, he isn't gonna apologize to you, me or anyone for any of the films he has done.

In 2012 is will be in a film called BEING FLYNN, which looks like a return to some good acting in a good movie. Let's pray this is true because the Irish Mob movie with him, Pacino and Pesci directed by Scorsese will probably never get made.

Dawn of the Dead Review

DAWN OF THE DEAD movie review

DAWN OF THE DEAD (1978) Dir. George A. Romero

It took George Romero another ten years to get the next chapter in his Living Dead saga made.  After a court battle with co-producer John Russo from Night of the Living Dead, it was decided that Russo’s titles could feature the phrase, “of the Living Dead”, while Romero was now to use, “of the Dead”. (Dawn, Day, Land, Diary, Survival).  This legal matter was probably expected when you had so many different investors who wished to continue making these Zombie films but no one single person owned the rights.  Regardless of rights George A. Romero is considered the Father of the genre.
So in 1978, with the help of Italian director Dario Argento, Romero created DAWN OF THE DEAD.  The deal the two struck was that Romero could make the version he wanted and distribute it in the USA, while Argento would have the right to re-edit as he saw fight for a European release.   Romero assembled a team, which featured Vietnam Veteran Tom Savini as Make up FX creator, and this film was shot in color creating a whole new sense of style and freedom for Romero.
This time around we get another group of pseudo-strangers forced together to flee a society that is breaking down quickly.  The number of zombies has multiplied greatly from Night of the Living Dead and now rescue stations and safe havens were becoming scarce.  Two members of a Swat Team and two members of a news crew take flight in a helicopter looking for a place to go.  With fuel running low, they spot a mall and decide there would be a good place to land and figure out what to do next.  But once in the mall the group realizes that staying put with all this commerce at their disposal may be the best option.
Things go well for awhile, and this group isn’t prone to the ego and infighting as were the characters in Night, but once again the strongest character is a black man named Peter.  The other two men are weaker; one is cowardly while the other is reckless.  And of course there is a woman in the mix, this time not catatonic, but cast to the background until she demands to learn how to use a weapon and fly the helicopter.  Again Romero claims to not have intentionally cast a black man in the hero role, and also has written a somewhat stronger female character, although her role in the efforts of these men is limited.
Things go well for awhile, but soon recklessness and necessary chance come at a price.  There are just too many zombies.   Romero uses the mall and the surrounding area to show the isolation these characters feel, even in a place so large as a mall.  At that time in the 70’s shopping malls were scarce and new to the American Consumer.  The film has always been seen as a commentary on American Consumerism, something I have never quite agreed with.  I just think that holing up in a place so large with all it has to offer is a wise choice, although the characters do have some fun shopping once they feel secure, but hey there is boredom to reckon with.
Now to shift focus on the zombies and how they look in this film; Romero is using color and with the introduction of Tom Savini what we get are truly horrific looking creatures.  Savini has claimed to have gone for the type of realism he saw while fighting in Vietnam and everything from decaying flesh to brutal gunshot wounds are plentiful in this film.  This level of gore and violence was still rare in American Cinema, but it an esthetic approach Romero used and would continue to use in each of the other zombie films he would create.   Savini used make up FX to create zombies that had just turned, as well as zombies that were further along in their decay, as well as a whole host of zombie created wounds. 
Now shooting in a working mall was not easy.  The mall would be open during the day, but from 10pm until 7am, the cast and crew had their way with the place.  The film was shot only at night, except for some daytime stuff that was picked up later on.  It was budgeted at a mere $650,000 and looks fantastic based on such limited financing.  One interesting fact is that the entire ending scene when the Bikers crash the mall and let in all the zombies was basically all improvised and not originally part of Romero’s script.  You get that feeling when watching the part of the movie as the story pauses for some real insanity and fun.  This gory horror flick definitely has a subtle sense of humor and is part of what makes it great. 
Ultimately, as would be expected some of the cast dies, but this time around not all of them do.  Peter, the hero and Fran the ever-stronger female survive, but not before Peter tells Fran to leave while he stays behind to shot himself.  He has a change of heart and suddenly finds himself in a fist fight with many zombies with some of the cheesiest A-Team sounding music, adding to the humor and horror of the scene.  Romero originally intended on Peter killing himself and Fran getting on the helicopter and then sticking her head in the rotating blade, but decided to allow some characters to survive.
The film ends with the two acknowledging that they are low on fuel, and don’t know where to go next.  Although they have survived the movie, we have no reason to believe or know how long or if they will survive later.

Added Note:  Argento’s edit of the movie cuts out a lot of the humor and he changes the music to actually create a more horrific and tighter version that Romero’s.  Romero’s is more fun, but Argento’s is more horrifying.

Romero’s Grade: A
Argento’s Grade: A+